AIMS accuses FSA of ruining Farmbox Meats business with investigation
The Association of Independent Meat Suppliers (AIMS) has slammed the Food Standards Agency (FSA) following the Farmbox Meats verdict over the mislabelling of goat meat as lamb or mutton, earlier this week.
Speaking to Meat Trades Journal, Norman Bagley speaking on behalf of the AIMS Board, said the meat that was incorrectly labelled had already been identified and was not going to be sold.
The Aberystwyth-based business had been found guilty of falsely describing food contrary to the Food Safety Act. Dafydd Raw-Rees, Farmbox Meats owner, and Colin Patterson, manager, both pleaded guilty in Southwark Crown Court to falsely describing food and failing to comply with food traceability requirements.
“Farmbox pleaded guilty to having goat trim and other low value remnants labelled as mutton or lamb trim. None of this product had been sold as such and it had already been identified by the plant as incorrectly labelled and put aside. Enquiries demonstrated that, at that time, not a single plant in the UK distinguished small volumes of goat from mutton,” said Bagley.
He questioned the FSA’s approach to the situation and accused the body of neglect.
“Repeated FSA audits of the Farmbox operation had identified no problems of this nature. We question why this business was ruined because of a victimless simple mistake, involving no financial gain? We also question whether the FSA staff who failed to assist the plant by neglecting to identify and warn of this problem during many routine audits have been dismissed or disciplined?”
Bagley praised the judge for the two-year conditional discharge and 12-week suspended sentence handed down to Raw-Rees and Patterson respectively.
“In Court the owner of the business received a conditional discharge, indicating that he had no criminal or moral culpability. The manager received no substantive penalty, no fine and no costs, merely a very short suspended sentence. This speaks for itself, yet another example of the Courts protecting citizens from the incompetence and vindictiveness of FSA.
“It should be recognised that FSA originally raided Farmbox without a shred of credible evidence that the business was involved in substituting horse for beef. It is likely that the FSA senior management who ordered the raid did not even know that the business was cutting up entirely legitimate horse carcases for export. It appears they did not even consult FSA staff who had attended the plant. And yet the same FSA senior management libelled Farmbox on prime time TV with baseless allegations, unsupported by any evidence, that they had supplied minced beef adulterated with horse, which was completely untrue. As a result, the business was needlessly ruined.”
A spokesperson from the Food Standards Agency said:
“Describing something as lamb when it is in fact cheaper goats meat is deception. Given that this was a criminal breach of the rules, which are there to protect consumers, we were pleased with the judge’s decision yesterday. We are disappointed that the representatives for Farmbox Meats have chosen to avoid addressing these fraudulent actions in their comments following the judge’s ruling.”
Want more stories like this in your inbox?
Sign up for our FREE email newsletter
- food standards agency
- standards agency
- farmbox meats
- meat suppliers aims
- agency following
- verdict earlier
- meats verdict
- standards agency following
- meats verdict earlier
- farmbox meats verdict
27 October, 2016, 8:30
Next steps for tackling obesity: prevention, sugar consumption a
01 - 03 November, 2016
China Foodtech 2017
07 November, 2016
Butcher’s Shop of the Year
01 December, 2016, 8:30 - 13:30
Policy priorities for the UK food, drink and farming industry